◉ Local capital allocation studio

Choose the right investments first.

Generate a first-pass decision-support brief for a place: ranked candidate interventions, local-fit rationale, first-100-days execution tasks, a 12–24 month roadmap, budget scenarios, delivery roles, risks, and assumptions to verify.

Primary output

Decision-support brief with candidate priorities

Use cases

City teams, donors, coalitions, implementation leads

Verification mode

Permalink + print-ready PDF for local review

Planning support, not an official decision. Verify priorities, costs, benefits, equity impacts, procurement rules, legal constraints, and implementation capacity with local stakeholders before acting.

Generate a plan

Enter a place name and get a decision-support investment brief with candidate priorities, timing, budgets, partners, risks, and verification prompts.

How to read the plan: start with the candidate opportunity ladder, then move into the 100-day execution board, the 12–24 month roadmap, and the budget + delivery sections.

How rankings should be interpreted: BCR/framework signals are triage inputs, not guarantees. Treat the order as a starting hypothesis to test against local data, stakeholder priorities, equity impacts, and delivery capacity.

BCR: benefit-cost framing from the underlying framework or model, adjusted only as far as the plan can infer.

Local fit: directional rationale that needs local validation from residents, implementers, budget owners, and technical reviewers.

Budgets: planning envelopes, not final cost estimates or procurement-ready budgets.

Personalization: opportunity order may reflect your local on-device clicks; it does not imply official endorsement.